You just hate Rolf, don't you?
Rolf is 7 levels under Titania right now, but his AS and def are the same, res is only one under, hit and dodge is almost exactly the same, and the difference between a Silver Axe and a Steel Bow is making about half of the difference between Atk. And to make up for 9 movement range, he has double space attack. Of course, this still doesn't fully compensate, but give Rolf some time and effort and he
will be equal to or better than Titania when they finally get to the same level.
This isn't about opinions, this debate is about facts.
Regardless of their level, the point remains that Titania is more effective at combat. She has a noticable offensive lead, better defenses (WTA, supports, HP), and much higher movement. Rofl's use of Bows is a
major disadvantage, as he's fighting once a turn and hindering progress massively. Titania's use of the two best weapons (which can be indirect, too) and a huge +3 Movement furthers proves how much better she is.
Also, getting Rofl to promotion takes alot of either Turns or BEXP, both reducing precious experience. Titania isn't hindered by this, since she's always awesome.
Rofl never makes it to Titania's level of usefullness. Never.
Well I guess there is no possible way we are going to reach a soloution, because we simply comepletely disagree. Your insisting that to compare stats everying else should be taken into account, and I'm saying that if your going to compare stats, you should only use the stats, otherwise your not comparing stats. Its not even something either of us can back up with pure fact, because we're just seeing it from different views.
Paladins have disadvantes, such as not being able to push or shoved, and must of the time not being able to be pushed/shoved. Which is surpisngly big. They suffer the most from terrain, being pushed down to three space movement on sand. Ike's lord class is the best, best stats, best Occult by far. Although using a one person class isn't really fair.
Because my point is more intelligent, in the least elitest and rudest way I can put it. Consider this. You have a character available from the start who's immediately good; best at this point. He's defeating enemies better than anyone. For the rest of the game, he's still beating most characters. Then you get a pathetically weak character. He can't even beat enemies within a reasonable time, and is dying very quick. The first character is beating him everywhere, correct? If the second character gets stronger, the first will still develop and remain stronger. Who is the better character?
Pushing and shoving are barely disadvantages, since both are rare to be used and the Paladin's move-attack proves much more useful. Also, Sol>Aether, as more characters can use it for much longer time with better activation rate.
Well its a teir list. Its bound to be debated and screwed. Although I bet you could make a skill teir list with little debate (key word little, bet there would still be some).
A tier list is made to be debated. That's the fun of it. ^_^
